I will just highlight the last paragraph in David Limbaugh's article:
"The irony is that liberals are the ones trapped in their own mythical narrative about white and conservative and evangelical racism because it is their best chance of holding their monopoly on black voters. If they were as concerned about blacks as much as they've convinced themselves they are, they would extricate themselves from the bonds of self-interest clouding their judgment and leading them to perpetuate the storyline and promote policies guaranteed, in the words of the insightful black writer William Owens Jr., to keep blacks 'in the bondage of a welfare mentality that will never afford us our true worth today or future potential for our children and grandchildren.' "
With the presidential race being held within the next 3 months or less it is important to judge the candidates on their qualifications. Obama cannot even make friends that aren't either racists (Rev. Wright) or criminals (Tony Rezko) so how can we trust him to have the diplomacy needed to run the government in such a way as to protect our national interests? He hasn't even served long enough in congress to have real experience.
With his opposition against pre-born life, how can we trust him to protect those of us who made it out of the womb safely? Go here for the full article.
"Here is what Obama said on the Senate floor that day in opposition to the bill:
'There was some suggestion that we might be able to craft something that might meet constitutional muster with respect to caring for fetuses or children who were delivered in this fashion. Unfortunately, this bill goes a little bit further, and so … this is probably not going to survive constitutional scrutiny. Number one, whenever we define a pre-viable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or other elements in the Constitution, what we’re really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a — a child, a nine-month-old — child that was delivered to term. That determination, then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place. I mean, it — it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an antiabortion statute.'
The absurd conclusion of Obama’s argument is hard to miss. He implies that “pre-viable” babies born prematurely, even without abortions, are somehow less “persons” than are babies who undergo nine months’ gestation before birth. "
All I am asking is that you think before you vote. What is important to you?
*When I think of his name I will update this, last name starts with an R. Friend of Obama who is currently in jail. Obama claims "This isn't the same" person he has known for 20 years just like he stated on Rev. Wright in claiming to not know his convoluted point of view on America.