"'There's not likely to be backlash if the message that's put out resonates with voters. Clearly, it's better to have more money than less. But the key to success is not money alone. ... We have had plenty of millionaire candidates who have failed, like (California Senate candidate) Michael Huffington, for example. The combination of the ability to get the message out and whether the message itself is one that resonates with people is critical,' he added." Steve Weissman, associate director of the Campaign Finance Institute.
If the dems understand that it is better to have more money than less in this instance, why won't they let us keep more of our own money than to "spread the wealth around"?
I have a very sneaky suspicion that the majority of the money is being sent from overseas. That will never be investigated though because it is up to the campaigns to remain faithful and true and since OBAMA is a liar, bigger even than Clinton (both of them), how in the helk could the campaign be trustworthy?